![]()
2023 Ford
|
![]()
2023 RAM
|
|
MPG - City | 19 - 20 MPG | 15 - 17 MPG |
MPG - Hwy | 19 - 26 MPG | 20 - 25 MPG |
Seating Capacity | 4 - 5 seats | 2 - 6 seats |
Cargo Space | 43.3 - 51.8 ft3 | 50.3 - 74.7 ft3 |
Engine |
|
|
Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
Drivetrain | Four Wheel Drive, Rear Wheel Drive | Four Wheel Drive, Rear Wheel Drive |
Horsepower | 270 hp | 305 - 395 hp |
Towing Capacity | Info not available | 4,350 - 8,240 lbs |
Exterior Length | 210.8 in | 229.0 - 237.9 in |
Exterior Width | 77.8 in | 79.4 in |
Leg Room |
Front 43.1 in
Rear 30.4 - 34.5 in |
Front 41.0 in
Rear 34.7 - 40.3 in |
Head Room |
Front 39.8 in
Rear 35.9 - 38.3 in |
Front 39.9 - 41.0 in
Rear 39.7 - 39.9 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). Clearly, the Ford Ranger is a better financial choice over the RAM 1500 Classic, when considering MSRP.
Utility
The Ford Ranger offers a little more seating capacity than the RAM 1500 Classic, making it a better choice for those who often have a crew with them.